Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit S. Maxx Mahaffey's column >>

S. MAXX MAHAFFEY

Home Page
Author, Professional Writer, Independent Publisher
Articles Posted: 15  Links Seeded: 1
Member Since: 6/2010  Last Seen: 7/14/2011

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Fox News, the most powerful name in news for Republican propaganda

Tue Mar 22, 2011 10:47 AM EDT
By S. Maxx Mahaffey
Advertise | AdChoices

[June 2010] The 2007 documentary “OUTFOXED: Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism” [WATCH VIDEO] examines how Rupert Murdoch's bias for all things conservative and love for Ronald Reagan, and his hatred of Senator Ted Kennedy and all things liberal created a political organization under the auspicious of a news organization with the intent of propagandizing the conservative philosophy. The film provides a disturbing look at the methodologies the most powerful name in news uses to advance the Republican agenda.

Murdoch, an Australian-born billionaire, entered the cable news market in 1996 with the Fox News Channel, a 24-hour cable news channel to compete with CNN. It was his answer to what he perceived as the “liberal media.” Fox News Channel became the “conservative media.”

It would be no surprise to anyone to know that Murdoch disagrees with the assertions made in the film. But no matter how he explains his original intent for starting Fox News Channel, what the organization became is the political and research arm of the Republican Party. It did not take long for Fox to eat into CNN’s market share and soon became known as “the most-watched cable news channel.”

To bring the so-called “liberal media” to its knees Murdoch hired heavy hitters from the Republican Party, conservative talk radio, and conservative newspapers. Roger Ailes, former media consultant for Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, and George H.W. Bush, became president of Fox News Channel. He was charged with carrying out Murdoch’s vision of media dominance.

Ailes turned his focus to bringing in controversial opinionated conservative talk show hosts Sean Hannity and Bill O’Reilly to serve as bullies and enforcers. They use their shows to take up the official conservative position and spin Republican talking points. Both hosts are well known for toxic rhetoric and verbally violent pushback on any group, news organization, or persons that dare to challenge their methods.

Hannity and O’Reilly will take a news story and invent some sort of issue around it and Fox news producer uses the issue to manufacture a controversy that is reported during their news hours. Glen Beck, their resident professor of doomsday prophecy, hammers away at convincing Fox viewers that under Democratic control, the country is headed for tyranny.

By nature of its own broadcasts and political leanings of its anchors, editors, commentators, guests, reporters, producers, and pundits, Fox’s objective is to advance conservative causes under the banner of a news organization to give a national platform to conservative activists so they can fiercely advocate for the conservative position.

Former Republican Congressman Joe Scarborough, host of MSNBC "Morning Joe" show [6/21/10] hailed Fox News chairman Roger Ailes as "the most powerful voice in the Republican Party” and gave the network itself credit for being "the only organizing institution for the GOP." This is a news organization being praised by a host of a show on another news network for violating the ethical standards of a journalist.

Their approach to journalism abuses the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ) Code of Ethics to “Remain free of associations and activities that may compromise integrity or damage credibility.”

It is no secret that Fox is adamantly opposed to any policy of the Obama Administration. President Obama described them this way: “I've got one television station that is entirely devoted to attacking my administration." Fox claims they are being tough because the so-called “liberal media” is in “bed” with Obama. Fox followers would more likely surmise that Fox is helping Conservatives to make sure Obama’s agenda is defeated. Fox has convinced its viewers that Obama is “bad for America.”

You would expect former DNC Chairman Howard Dean to say that Fox was a "right-wing propaganda machine," but his accusation is supported by Republicans, like columnist Jonah Goldberg, who was quoted as saying, "I think liberals have reasonable gripes with Fox News. It does lean to the right, primarily in its opinion programming but also in its story selection (which is fine by me) and elsewhere. But it is worth remembering that Fox is less a bastion of ideological conservatism and more a populist, tabloidy network."

Fox tells its viewers “We report, you decide”, but what their viewers hear and see on Fox are news stories favorable to conservative ideology and the Republican agenda and the endorsement of the idea that conservatives are “real Americans” and the Republican Party is on the side of “real Americans”. In comparison, they unashamedly lie, distort, and misrepresent information to portray Democrats and liberals as evil, morally corrupt, un-American, unpatriotic, and too inept to govern. Just another defiance of the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ) Code of Ethics, which states, “Deliberate distortion is never permissible.”

The mission of Fox News’ broadcasts is simple…to drive nails into the coffin of liberalism forever.
----
© 2010 Shar’Ron Maxx Mahaffey. All rights reserved.

Follow me on Twitter at: www.twitter.com/smaxxmahaffey

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • S. Maxx Mahaffey's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (3)
S. Maxx Mahaffey

"In examining the character of the media, most Americans would agree that for any news organizations to have a financial stake in the outcome of the news or to act as a surrogate for any political party or any political candidate is a greater threat to the foundation of our democracy than weapons of mass destruction is to our security. We are protected from foreign threats by a powerful and sophisticated military weapon defense system, but what is our protection from our own news media." http://smaxxmahaffey.newsvine.com/_news/2010/06/30/4588518-examining-the-character-of-the-news-media

    Reply#1 - Tue Mar 22, 2011 10:20 AM EDT
    glenn beck, sr

    enjoyed reading, and if going by your descricption of fox as a propaganda machine for the conservatives , i would have to say your a propaganda puppet for the left socailist loving agenda. its cool, your chioce but i watch ed,morning joe, and matthews every day before i reveiw news on fox and its funny what msnbc and others who rally behind socailism and communism and anti american hatred leave out in their news storys and refuse to comment on.

    why dont you write about farachauns 2 hr rant the other day, do you agree with his words about his ongoing haterd of whites and america or can you say publiclly i disagree with him.

      Reply#2 - Fri Apr 1, 2011 2:20 PM EDT
      S. Maxx Mahaffey

      I can feel your anger, but angry about what? Your response is exactly how Fox viewers are ginned up to behave angrily and hostile against anyone who questions their tactics.

      I have written about Farrakhan and spoke openly about how divisive he is. He's no different than Rush Limbaugh in my opinion, except he does it in the name of religion and Rush demoralizes human beings for a living. He gets paid millions to make blacks feel like outsiders and unwelcomed in the country they helped build. Please! A hater is a hater no matter what color he or she is. The negative energy of hate does not discriminate. It is toxic no matter who is spewing hatred. Farrakhan is as divisive as they come. So, YES, absolutely, I don't have a problem calling a spade a spade.

      Regarding commentators on MSNBC, again, you make accusations not based in facts. I tweet, email Ed and Cenk and used to email Keith for taking their criticism of Republicans too far. It's fine to disagree with President Obama or any other poltiician, but to be so blatantly disrespectful and racist is unacceptable. I vehmently disagreed with Bush policies, and wrote letters and emails to him expressing my views, as I do with Obama, but I did not attack Bush character. In fact, I thought he was quite funny in a sincere sense, but he was a highly ineffective, partisan president, and I stand by that.

      As far as the race thing, that is a non issue for me because my mother's father is white and so are my children's grandfather. I have sister-in-laws and nephew-in-laws who are white or Latino and I have nieces and nephews whose mothers are of a different race. I will never deny myself love or anything else because of race. It's the one thing you cannot change.

      I appreciate your comments, but I now want to ask you, can you publicly denounce Fox News for what is apparent blatant bias against all things Democrat or Obama or Liberals or blacks or Muslims or gays or do you agree with those views?

      • 1 vote
      #2.1 - Fri Apr 15, 2011 10:14 PM EDT
      Reply
      Leave a Comment:
      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
      You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
      (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
      Newsvine Privacy Statement
      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
      FUN STUFF:
      • Leaderboard |
      • E-Mail Alerts |
      • Top of the Vine |
      • Newsvine Live |
      • Newsvine Archives |
      • The Greenhouse |
      COMPANY STUFF:
      • Code of Honor |
      • Company Info |
      • Contact Us |
      • Jobs |
      • User Agreement |
      • Privacy Policy |
      • About our ads
      LEGAL STUFF:
      • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
      • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
      • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com